Riveting Results uses the latest findings from the science of reading and brain science and decades of experience teaching reading and writing in urban and suburban schools to craft activities that engage all students in reading whole books of complex text.
Contact usIn high school, grade-level readings in all classes consist almost entirely of the long sentences, advanced vocabulary, varied syntax, and conceptual density that define complex texts. For high school students to study subject matter that is mature enough to engage them in long-term study, whether in science, history, English, or math, they need to be able to read complex text at their grade level.
Unfortunately, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the majority (64%) of entering high school students cannot read and thoroughly comprehend grade-level texts. Ninety-six percent of entering ninth-grade EL students cannot read grade-level texts in high school. 1
In order to address this deficit, the Common Core Standards make clear that teachers need to make complex texts, and the guided instruction required to scaffold those activities, the focus of their students’ experiences. Meredith Liben and Susan Pimental of Student Achievement Partners, in their 2019 article “Placing Texts at the Center of the Standards-Aligned ELA Classroom” explained the limitations of reading simpler texts: “Simpler texts, by their very nature, lack the features that make text complex, forcing students to artificially practice using strategies where there is no real need.”2 In other words, students will not learn to read complex text unless they practice actually reading these longer sentences with unfamiliar vocabulary.
1. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP, 2019. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading?grade=8.
2. Meredith Liben and Susan Pimental, “Placing Texts at the Center of the Standards-Aligned ELA Classroom,” Student Achievement Partners, 2018, p. 5.
In order for high school students to engage in the hard work of understanding advanced-level texts, they need more than skill. They need to experience joy in their reading. The right books engage high school students more than excerpts or even excellent short stories because their length allows readers to develop a deeper bond with the characters, a greater stake in the plot’s outcome, and greater curiosity about the topics explored. In fact, that’s what makes a great book great—its ability to draw the reader in and continuously reward this long-term close attention. Books are a powerful tool to address the waning of students’ attention that we see in many classrooms.
After testing dozens of books with thousands of students, Riveting Results has chosen the books below because they have particularly fascinating protagonists and exciting narratives that engage every student—and because they build students’ background knowledge about history and science.
NINTH-GRADE TEXTS
The Secret of the Yellow Death by Suzanne Jurmain 3
The Secret of the Yellow Death vividly describes the desperate struggles and tremendous courage of the doctors who raced to find a cure for yellow fever at the turn of the 20th century. These doctors not only discovered the source of yellow fever, but created an ethical framework for using humans as subjects in dangerous experiments.
The Big Sea by Langston Hughes 4
Langston Hughes’s autobiography describes his life up to young adulthood. We see Hughes rebel against the expectations of his father, struggle against the racism he encounters throughout the United States, and travel the world—experiences that he would ultimately transform into poetry, essays, stories, and novels as a central figure of the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s and throughout his literary career.
TENTH-GRADE TEXTS
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave by Frederick Douglass 5
Tragically, high school students often find Douglass’s account of his youth, one of the greatest works of American literature, both difficult and boring. The Riveting Results approach, however, gives teachers the supports they need to guide students through Douglass’s challenging sentences and vocabulary so that they can empathize as Douglass discovers the power of his mind amid the horrors of slavery.
Homegoing by Yaa Gyasi 6
Yaa Gyasi traces the lives of two sisters born in what is now Ghana and the lives of seven generations of their descendants. After having read Douglass’s autobiography, students deepen their understanding of U.S. history and experience a family’s struggles and joys after slavery. Students also discover what it was like to live in precolonial, colonial, and independent Ghana.
3. Suzanne Jurmain, The Secret of the Yellow Death, (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009).
4. Langston Hughes, The Big Sea, (New York: Hill and Wang, 1968).
5. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave (New York: Dover Publications, 1994).
6. Yaa Gyasi, Homegoing, (New York: Vintage Books, 2016).
Two books doesn’t sound like a lot, but consider that each page of these texts is made up of difficult sentences and unfamiliar vocabulary. The Riveting Results method ensures that all students read each complex book carefully and thoroughly, internalizing the comprehension and analytical skills they need to read other grade-level texts independently in every class. Once able to independently tackle complex books, students go on to read advanced-level literature, history, and science texts in eleventh and twelfth grades.
While the curriculum’s modular structure allows teachers to speed up or slow down the pace of the curriculum, teachers often spend six weeks on the introductory Focus and Flow unit and three months on each book unit. At this pace, students have time to apply their growing knowledge of the characters’ motivations and tendencies within the context of an evolving narrative, resulting in more meaningful analysis. Students’ writing becomes more persuasive as they develop the know-how to fully develop their ideas about the text.
By adhering to rigorous expectations for reading beautiful narratives, teachers imbue students with the confidence to tackle any complex text.
Notably, the Riveting Results curriculum is implemented only during class time. There is no work required at home. See below for more on how and why this strategy develops students’ proficiency with text and love of books.
Current English textbooks typically structure their units around a certain theme, surrounding excerpts from complex texts with links to videos or simpler texts. Publishers believe that these simpler texts will provide extra insight to students, and enable students reading years below grade level to access complex text. Unfortunately, this strategy does not work.
For example, in a typical ELA curriculum a teacher might ask students to read the following summary of the Underground Railroad prior to reading a complex text about slavery:
The underground railroad was not a real railroad. It was a collection of escape routes and places to stay. (Associated Press, adapted by Newsela)
In this version, the Underground Railroad is reduced to a series of hideouts and escape routes. Students miss discovering the complex set of emotions that runaway slaves felt and the ideas that they developed about freedom as they fled North. This surface-level understanding is not engaging for high school students and it does not add to their insight about how slavery affected people in America at that time and now. And this superficial understanding of the Underground Railroad doesn’t prepare students to tackle the complex sentences and concepts in Frederick Douglass’s ingenious autobiography.
Teachers who use the Riveting Results program, on the other hand, have the content, lesson structure, and software they need to focus their students entirely on reading complex text. Practicing reading complex text every day with quick feedback is the only way to get better at reading complex text. And in the process of practicing this challenging skill, students build greater insight into their world. In the Riveting Results program, when students read Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, they discover how Douglass imagined the Underground Railroad wreaking havoc in the minds of slaveholders. Reading this passage, students develop ideas about how a life of slavery affected Douglass and his relationships with his enslavers:
I would keep the merciless slaveholder profoundly ignorant of the means of flight adopted by the slave. I would leave him to imagine himself surrounded by myriads of invisible tormentors, ever ready to snatch from his infernal grasp his trembling prey. 7
7. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave (New York: Dover Publications, 1994), 60.
Educational researchers and practitioners agree that this country’s approach to adolescent literacy instruction for students of color needs to change. In her Cultivating Genius, for example, Gholdy Muahmmed exhorts teachers to tap into the natural desire of their students of color to impact the thinking of their classmates and teachers. She lays out the following three imperatives that teachers should follow in order to help each student establish their “literary presence” in the classroom:
The Riveting Results approach implements all three of these components in its classrooms. From its first lesson in the introductory unit, each student discovers that their perspective is unique and that it matters to their teachers and classmates. They love playing with language by reading aloud, detecting and clarifying misconceptions, debating their interpretations, and then sharing their analyses. With apps that organize these activities and the student work, the teacher can focus on eliciting students’ ideas and can quickly spot areas where they need support.
Riveting Results has also chosen books that provide a deep dive into the lives of people of color through various periods of history. In ninth grade, Suzanne Jurmain’s The Secret of the Yellow Death9 describes the work of Cuban and American scientists racing to figure out the origin of yellow fever. The Big Sea is Langston Hughes’s autobiography of his early life as he travels the world and grows into the writer who would become a central figure of the Harlem Renaissance. 10
In tenth grade, students read Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave11, discovering how Douglass builds a clearheaded sense of his own humanity amid the horrors of slavery. The tenth-grade program concludes with Homegoing12, a book that traces the life of two sisters from what is present-day Ghana, one who is enslaved and sent to America and one who stays in Africa, and then follows the seven generations of each sister’s descendents.
8. Gholdy Muhammad, Cultivating Genius: An Equity Framework for Culturally and Historically Responsive Literacy (New York: Scholastic, 2020), 28.
9. Suzanne Jurmain, The Secret of the Yellow Death, (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009).
10. Langston Hughes, The Big Sea, (New York: Hill and Wang, 1968).
11. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, (New York: Dover Publications, 1994).
12. Yaa Gyasi, Homegoing, (New York: Vintage Books, 2016).
Only 4% of eighth-grade English learners scored proficient on the National Assessment of Academic Progress 2019 test.13 Conversely, 96% of eighth-grade English learners can’t comprehend the complex texts necessary for succeeding at high-school level classes. The majority of these students start ninth grade more than two years behind. Teachers of adolescent English learners need to work as efficiently as possible and focus their instruction on the highest-leverage activities so that these students can make good use of their time in high school classes.
For example, in order for students to acquire necessary vocabulary when reading a complex text, teachers cannot merely expose students to the meaning of the word multiple times. They need to present the words in activities in which students are “actively involved…in manipulating and analyzing word meanings.”14 In Riveting Results’ fluency activities, students play with language, trying out different emotions as they empathize with a character’s experiences. Riveting Results’ Rereading and Paraphrase activities also structure active discussions between students as they debate the significance of words or phrases. Vocabulary exercises focus students on specific academic vocabulary in the context of the text they are reading, requiring students to choose the accurate contextual meaning from among other possible definitions of the word. Students use these words in their own sentences, further grounding their word-level understanding.
Effective instruction of EL students also requires what What Works Clearinghouse calls “peer-assisted learning opportunities in which pairs of students at different ability levels or different English language proficiencies work together on academic tasks in a structured fashion.”15 The Rereading and Paraphrase activities structure opportunities for students with different skills to debate their unique perspectives regarding a complex text.
Finally, the Riveting Results apps clearly display student data so that teachers can identify, before and even during class, when EL students exhibit what EL literacy researchers call “mastery learning”16 before they move on to the next activity. Through the apps, teachers can easily instruct a student on their strengths, areas where they can improve, and the precise activity they need to complete in order to attain mastery of a specific skill.
13. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP, 2019. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading?grade=8.
14. Claude Goldenberg, “Teaching English Learners,” American Educator, 2008, 19.
15. U.S. Department of Education, “Effective Literacy and English Language Instruction for English Learners in the Elementary Grades.” What Works Clearinghouse, 2007, 28. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/6)
16. Goldenberg, p. 17.
The Tennessee State Collaborative on Reforming Education’s “The Science of Reading” states:
Fluency is the bridge between decoding and comprehension. Fluent readers read with accuracy, automaticity and expression. They immediately recognize words and can cluster words into meaningful phrases. Fluent readers decode without much effort, allowing them to dedicate energy to making meaning from what they read.17
In 2000, the National Reading Panel determined that repeated oral reading practice had an “impressive” impact on secondary-level students’ reading comprehension.18
Students who hear a passage read by a strong reader and then receive guidance as they continue to practice reading that passage aloud can internalize the way that complex text works, understanding how certain clauses advance an author’s meaning in precise ways. If high school students engage in systematic and sustained fluency practice while reading grade-level texts, those who began the year reading four and five years below grade level only need a few months to read complex text fluently. Once students are fluent, they can put their energy into comprehension and interpreting the text, appreciating the plot’s twists and turns, the characters’ motivations, and the new knowledge about the world to be gained. Fluency with complex text is not sufficient for comprehension, but it is necessary.
Middle and high school students, unfortunately, typically do not practice fluency. When teachers try to monitor adolescents’ fluency, they typically use an approach copied from elementary classrooms with the teacher sitting beside the students and giving them 60 seconds to read as many words as possible while marking them down for mistakes. Adolescents hate being told to hurry and resent when the teacher points out their mistakes. In addition, complex text demands a more nuanced approach to reading aloud, one that enables students to slow down and speed up and change intonation as longer clauses and more sophisticated vocabulary express a wide range of emotions and overlay increasingly complex bits of knowledge.
Middle and high school students enjoy playing with language, and, in the right context, love to perform. Riveting Results’ apps enable teachers to guide students through a carefully scaffolded process in which they play with language privately as they practice reading longer and longer passages. Students submit their recordings through the app and scorers listen and respond, communicating to the teacher which students are ready to move on to the next step and letting students know that a real person has been impacted by their reading. The app leverages students’ drive to improve and connect, giving them structure and feedback so that they can read with authority and confidence.
17. State Collaborative on Reforming Education, “The Science of Reading,” Winter 2020, 9.
18. ‘Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implication for Reading Instruction,” National Reading Panel, 2000, 3-3.
In its Inclusive Practice Tool, Massachusetts’ Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) states that in order to create a fully inclusive classroom for special education students, teachers should “[present] curriculum content through multiple means and [provide] scaffolds and support for metacognitive processing.” It also states that teachers should “[use] data and student response[s] to differentiate instruction and support.”19
Riveting Results, through its four high-leverage learning activities (fluency, rereading, paraphrase, and analysis), enables teachers to address these expectations by providing them with a multimodal, structured approach to accelerating the development of their students’ reading skills. Students listen to professional actors read text aloud, then they practice reading aloud independently. After they practice fluency, students debate their understanding of the text with a partner and the class. Once they have played with and interpreted the text and integrated it through short writing activities with their own personal experiences, students are ready to respond to analytical essay prompts about the author’s purpose. As students complete their work, Riveting Results’ clear and accessible data display enables teachers to determine when students can move forward and when they need more support.
Through this process, students of all different levels of reading achievement discover that they have unique perspectives and that they can make a significant contribution to the class’ learning.
19. “Inclusive Practice Tool,” Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2. https://www.doe.mass.edu/edeval/guidebook/4a-observations.pdf.
There is a concern among many parents and educators that implementing SEL during the school day, while important, is problematic because many educators and parents fear that a focus on SEL crowds out time for academics. A 2021 Fordham Institute study advocated resolving this concern by framing robust academic experiences as simultaneous SEL activities.20
Riveting Results embraces this approach. The introductory unit provides students with the routines and foundational skills they need to recognize their unique perspectives and express them in social situations and in writing. Teachers focus their feedback on moments when students successfully convey their perspectives. Once students begin reading a book, reading activities help them develop their own ideas based on careful observations of the text. Sharing protocols help them compare their ideas with those of other students and use those comparisons to understand the book more deeply. When students read The Secret of the Yellow Death21, for example, they develop their own opinions about the ethical framework doctors developed for medical testing at the turn of the 20th century. When reading TheBig Sea, students discover how Langston Hughes’s evolving view of race collided with his father’s.22
20. Adam Tyner, “How to Sell SEL: Parents and the Politics of Social Emotional Learning,” Thomas Fordham, 2021. https://sel.fordhaminstitute.org.
21. Suzanne Jurmain, The Secret of the Yellow Death, (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2009).
22. Langston Hughes, The Big Sea, (New York: Hill and Wang, 1968).
When paraphrasing, students try to include all of the meaning the author intends and leave nothing out. They reveal exactly what they think each word and phrase means, conveying their particular understanding and enabling them to compare that understanding with that of another reader. Through these comparisons, students (and of course teachers) can spot paraphrases that stretch the author’s meaning too far, making it possible for students to spot successful and unsuccessful paraphrases and become better readers in the process.
Summarizing requires students to understand each word, phrase, sentence, and paraphrase, and then use that understanding to generalize from that language and condense it. Students’ ability to generalize and condense improves as they develop a broad base of general knowledge of the world and of books. A “bad” summary may be due to misunderstanding of the language, or it may simply be a misjudgement about what “matters” most in a piece of text. Improving one’s ability to summarize is a long, complex process requiring that the student remain confident in the face of patient critical feedback from particularly skillful teachers over many years.
Paraphrasing, in contrast to summary, is typically the better way to appreciate the unique artistry and insight of literature. Consider, for example, how students might summarize the following passage from Chapter 7 of Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass in which Douglass describes how learning to read destabilized him.
Freedom now appeared to disappear no more forever. It was heard in every sound and seen in every thing. It was ever present to torment me with a sense of my wretched condition. I saw nothing without seeing it. I heard nothing without hearing it, and felt nothing without feeling it.23
A good summary would include that Douglass realizes that learning to read has opened his mind to the horrors of slavery and that this realization was extremely painful for him. The teacher, in response, can say that this summary is “right” or “wrong” and add to it or subtract from it to improve it—seemingly arbitrarily. It’s a pretty unsatisfying exchange for both student and teacher. At best, the student comes away from this reading with a cliché about the relationship between knowledge and pain.
The Riveting Results Paraphrase Activity, on the other hand, asks students to work phrase by phrase, expressing Douglass’s meaning in their own words as best they can. In this case, it is easy for the teacher to see if the student changed Douglass’s words and phrasing and whether the substitute words are close enough to Douglass’s to be called a paraphrase. Assessment is quick and transparent to the student. But more importantly, the teacher can guide a discussion that compares the student’s paraphrase to that of a classmate, figuring out phrase by phrase which paraphrase is closer to Douglass’s meaning. Students can learn to do these comparisons themselves, finding Douglass’s insight into his learning process and seeing what they themselves gain by discussing great literature.
23. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave (New York: Dover Publications, 1994), 24.
Research shows that there is a positive correlation between completing homework and students’ achievement (grades), but no correlation between completing homework and performance on tests that measure skills.24 Even though teachers hold students accountable for homework by reducing their grades when they don’t complete it, the extra time spent working at home does not build skills for those students completing homework.
And we know that students with fewer resources have more difficulty completing homework, making it an unnecessary element of schooling that drives persistent underachievement by students living in poverty. 25
While the research is convincing that homework does not improve academic performance and that it does drive inequities in student achievement, teachers continue to spend an enormous amount of time and energy planning and supervising students’ homework. It is hard enough for parents to supervise their children’s homework when they are living in the same house. It turns out to be an impossible task for teachers to do from school.
When teachers look at the work that students complete at home, they find with frustration that the work is often:
Not surprisingly, teachers report that looking at student work is one of the most unpleasant parts of teaching. Homework that consists of independent reading is particularly difficult to assess the next day in school. Most teachers use comprehension quizzes, which are necessarily inaccurate. The quizzes only show whether students have understood the text in the way the teacher hopes, not whether or not students spent time trying to read the text.
While homework is difficult to assess fairly and usefully, it is even harder to assess how a teacher uses homework. Observational protocols that administrators use to assess classroom teaching often include contradictory guidance about homework, asking the administrator to notice whether the teacher:
An administrator trying to focus teachers on equity will often emphasize including students in class at all costs, further frustrating a teacher who has worked so hard to create meaningful homework and hold students accountable.
As many arguments as there are for not making homework an essential part of instruction, there are even more compelling reasons to assign students to do the most critical work during class when the teacher can support and further challenge all students.
Other approaches are not conducive to this individual supervision of classwork. But Riveting Results’ activities create habits and routines in the classroom that make it both possible and satisfying for teachers to work individually with each student. And by working individually with each student, the teacher can appreciate each student’s unique perspective, further motivating all students to produce authentic work that represents their best effort. Teachers find looking at work produced under these conditions to be satisfying—and even fun. It is easy to spot and react to students’ insights, and also easy to spot students who require some redirection. Students’ motivation builds as they produce authentic work that is recognized by their teacher. Together, these students and their teacher create an irresistibly engaging classroom community.
Counterintuitively, supervising students’ essential reading and writing also allows for teachers to push students to be more independent. The supports that a teacher uses in Riveting Results’ activities are modular and once students show mastery with support, the teacher can systematically withdraw that support until students produce their work independently.
Students who are proficient readers and writers, and who enjoy reading and writing, are then ready to take the next step to organize their lives outside of the classroom in order to do productive work in their own spaces.
24. Harris Cooper, Jorgianne Civey Robinson, Erika A. Patall, “Does Homework Improve Academic Achievement? A Synthesis of Research, 1987–2003,” Review of Educational Research 76, no. 1, Spring 2006: 1–62.
25. Etta Kravolac and John Buell, “End Homework Now,” Educational Leadership 58, no. 7, Apr 2001: 39-42. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ626293.
Probably not. Riveting Results works because it ensures that your students spend more time practicing reading complex text.
A lot more time.
The teacher will see evidence of progress in students' productivity and skills within days. But in order for the program to change what students do long-term, the teacher needs to use the program during most of the students' time as they learn how to apply these skills in all sorts of different situations.
By enabling students to tackle complex text, the teacher can then do various activities to harness students' knowledge and insights, as long as that teacher continues to give students daily practice with the Riveting Results exercises.
Based on ACT results, we see that two years of work in this way enables all of our students to go on and work independently with complex text in less structured AP and early college-level classes.
We begin with writing.
Writing tasks (properly designed) show students how to learn in a way that is deeply satisfying. We get all students writing on the first day and most importantly make it possible for all students to get feedback that shows them where they are writing powerfully and how they can do more of it.
The program guides students through a skills sequence that enables them to notice how and when they write powerfully. We don't distract students with complex rubrics or checklists and instead, day by day, show them how to develop ideas and get other people to pay attention to them. Students systematically learn to reveal the complexity of their own thinking in regular writing tasks.
We give teachers simple ways to track progress, making it possible for secondary school teachers (with 100-150 students) to adjust how they approach different students with different writing strengths and weaknesses.
The program makes the process of producing writing simple for teachers and students so that they can spend their valuable time reading, thinking about what they are reading, and getting better at sharing their ideas with others.
We are experienced teachers and administrators who can help you figure out if Riveting Results is a match for your school.
We will respond to your email within 24 hours.